I have a table with 3.5 million records and 50 columns. Users have been
complaining that they get ODBC errors when trying to run any query from MS
Access against this table. I created a view few fewer columns (about 25).
When I test it by doing select * from viewx in the query analyzer on my local
machine it takes 14 minutes (slams my machine) to get back the whole dataset.
What could be happening.
Comments Please.
Thank youBringing back 3.5 million rows will take time. Who could make use of such many rows.
Start by retrieving only the data you need, then tune the query by adding indexes etc to get better
execution times.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
Blog: http://solidqualitylearning.com/blogs/tibor/
"helpplease" <helpplease@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D1F44BC4-6478-4155-B9FF-5F6AF1A030E8@.microsoft.com...
>I have a table with 3.5 million records and 50 columns. Users have been
> complaining that they get ODBC errors when trying to run any query from MS
> Access against this table. I created a view few fewer columns (about 25).
> When I test it by doing select * from viewx in the query analyzer on my local
> machine it takes 14 minutes (slams my machine) to get back the whole dataset.
> What could be happening.
> Comments Please.
> Thank you|||Do you have the WHERE clause in you SELECT ?
Please, post the execution plan for your query.
--
** * Esta msg foi útil pra você ? Então marque-a como tal. ***
Regards,
Rodrigo Fernandes
"helpplease" wrote:
> I have a table with 3.5 million records and 50 columns. Users have been
> complaining that they get ODBC errors when trying to run any query from MS
> Access against this table. I created a view few fewer columns (about 25).
> When I test it by doing select * from viewx in the query analyzer on my local
> machine it takes 14 minutes (slams my machine) to get back the whole dataset.
> What could be happening.
> Comments Please.
> Thank you
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment