Hello! anybody know some tool to synchronizate data between databases (two
databases has the same structure) . I can not use replicate becouse I have
not a permanet connection between servers. Now, somebody can send me a
backup peridocally using email. And I can restore in a second database in
local and work in local with principal and second database, then send back
the backup sinchronized.
Thank you in advance and sorry for my english.
Guillermo
You might be able to use tools like RedGate software's data compare -
however they too will require a network connection.
You can replicate using merge replication or transactional replication to a
local database and then hack the msmerge_contents or msmerge_tombstone
tables for merge replication, or use sp_browsereplcmds for transactional
replication to get a list of the changes and then apply these on either
side.
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Guillermo Villanueva" <guillermovil@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OTu6RLM4GHA.5000@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hello! anybody know some tool to synchronizate data between databases (two
> databases has the same structure) . I can not use replicate becouse I have
> not a permanet connection between servers. Now, somebody can send me a
> backup peridocally using email. And I can restore in a second database in
> local and work in local with principal and second database, then send back
> the backup sinchronized.
> Thank you in advance and sorry for my english.
> Guillermo
>
|||"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> You might be able to use tools like RedGate software's data compare -
> however they too will require a network connection.
> You can replicate using merge replication or transactional replication to a
> local database and then hack the msmerge_contents or msmerge_tombstone
> tables for merge replication, or use sp_browsereplcmds for transactional
> replication to get a list of the changes and then apply these on either
> side.
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
> positions, strategies or opinions.
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
>
> "Guillermo Villanueva" <guillermovil@.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:OTu6RLM4GHA.5000@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
>
Showing posts with label replicate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label replicate. Show all posts
Thursday, March 29, 2012
data synchronization
Labels:
becouse,
database,
databases,
microsoft,
mysql,
oracle,
replicate,
server,
sql,
structure,
synchronizate,
synchronization,
tool,
twodatabases
data synchronization
Hello! anybody know some tool to synchronizate data between databases (two
databases has the same structure) . I can not use replicate becouse I have
not a permanet connection between servers. Now, somebody can send me a
backup peridocally using email. And I can restore in a second database in
local and work in local with principal and second database, then send back
the backup sinchronized.
Thank you in advance and sorry for my english.
Guillermo
You might be able to use tools like RedGate software's data compare -
however they too will require a network connection.
You can replicate using merge replication or transactional replication to a
local database and then hack the msmerge_contents or msmerge_tombstone
tables for merge replication, or use sp_browsereplcmds for transactional
replication to get a list of the changes and then apply these on either
side.
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Guillermo Villanueva" <guillermovil@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OTu6RLM4GHA.5000@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hello! anybody know some tool to synchronizate data between databases (two
> databases has the same structure) . I can not use replicate becouse I have
> not a permanet connection between servers. Now, somebody can send me a
> backup peridocally using email. And I can restore in a second database in
> local and work in local with principal and second database, then send back
> the backup sinchronized.
> Thank you in advance and sorry for my english.
> Guillermo
>
|||"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> You might be able to use tools like RedGate software's data compare -
> however they too will require a network connection.
> You can replicate using merge replication or transactional replication to a
> local database and then hack the msmerge_contents or msmerge_tombstone
> tables for merge replication, or use sp_browsereplcmds for transactional
> replication to get a list of the changes and then apply these on either
> side.
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
> positions, strategies or opinions.
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
>
> "Guillermo Villanueva" <guillermovil@.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:OTu6RLM4GHA.5000@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
>
databases has the same structure) . I can not use replicate becouse I have
not a permanet connection between servers. Now, somebody can send me a
backup peridocally using email. And I can restore in a second database in
local and work in local with principal and second database, then send back
the backup sinchronized.
Thank you in advance and sorry for my english.
Guillermo
You might be able to use tools like RedGate software's data compare -
however they too will require a network connection.
You can replicate using merge replication or transactional replication to a
local database and then hack the msmerge_contents or msmerge_tombstone
tables for merge replication, or use sp_browsereplcmds for transactional
replication to get a list of the changes and then apply these on either
side.
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Guillermo Villanueva" <guillermovil@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OTu6RLM4GHA.5000@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hello! anybody know some tool to synchronizate data between databases (two
> databases has the same structure) . I can not use replicate becouse I have
> not a permanet connection between servers. Now, somebody can send me a
> backup peridocally using email. And I can restore in a second database in
> local and work in local with principal and second database, then send back
> the backup sinchronized.
> Thank you in advance and sorry for my english.
> Guillermo
>
|||"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> You might be able to use tools like RedGate software's data compare -
> however they too will require a network connection.
> You can replicate using merge replication or transactional replication to a
> local database and then hack the msmerge_contents or msmerge_tombstone
> tables for merge replication, or use sp_browsereplcmds for transactional
> replication to get a list of the changes and then apply these on either
> side.
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
> positions, strategies or opinions.
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
>
> "Guillermo Villanueva" <guillermovil@.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:OTu6RLM4GHA.5000@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
>
Labels:
becouse,
database,
databases,
microsoft,
mysql,
oracle,
replicate,
server,
sql,
structure,
synchronizate,
synchronization,
tool,
twodatabases
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Data replication issues
Hi,
We have an SQL server (lets call it FTANT001) and a
datatbase (lets say LETS30). I want to replicate the
database in the same server under the name LETS30_Repl.
Naturally the publisher, distributer and subscriber is the
same server FTANT001. I am susing a 'snapshot agent' to
replicate the database. I have successfully created the
publication (named as LETS30_Article). I have set up the
snapshot to be taken everyday at 7:00am. My problem is the
distribution agent status always shows as 'Never started'.
What could be the problem. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Sabuj
Sabuj,
what is the distribution agent's schedule? My guess is that it hasn't
matched its schedule time yet. Try running it manually to check that
everything is OK.
HTH,
Paul Ibison
We have an SQL server (lets call it FTANT001) and a
datatbase (lets say LETS30). I want to replicate the
database in the same server under the name LETS30_Repl.
Naturally the publisher, distributer and subscriber is the
same server FTANT001. I am susing a 'snapshot agent' to
replicate the database. I have successfully created the
publication (named as LETS30_Article). I have set up the
snapshot to be taken everyday at 7:00am. My problem is the
distribution agent status always shows as 'Never started'.
What could be the problem. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Sabuj
Sabuj,
what is the distribution agent's schedule? My guess is that it hasn't
matched its schedule time yet. Try running it manually to check that
everything is OK.
HTH,
Paul Ibison
Labels:
adatatbase,
call,
database,
ftant001,
lets30,
microsoft,
mysql,
oracle,
replicate,
replication,
server,
sql,
thedatabase
data replicate incorret field (Urgent)
I'm using SQL 2000 with SP3 and made an replication link to another server.
A few weeks ago, I drop the replication and add a new column in both
publisher and subscriber server and made a new replication. Recently, I
found that a new column did not replicate a data. I check with
sp_browsereplcmds found that it update a another field. Why? How to fix it?
please help
RC
Firstly, it's worth mentioning that sp_repladdcolumn will do what you
require 'in-place' ie there's no need to set up the publication from
scratch. You may have had other reasons for doing this anyway. So, to find
out a little more, are the schemas on the publisher and subscriber now
identical? If not, do you have any filters in place? Did you create the
replication stored procedures yourself?
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
|||the schema is the same on publisher and subscriber and no columns filtering
RC
"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@.Pygmalion.Com> glsD:%23M9TOCQFGHA.1312@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx .gbl...
> Firstly, it's worth mentioning that sp_repladdcolumn will do what you
> require 'in-place' ie there's no need to set up the publication from
> scratch. You may have had other reasons for doing this anyway. So, to find
> out a little more, are the schemas on the publisher and subscriber now
> identical? If not, do you have any filters in place? Did you create the
> replication stored procedures yourself?
> Cheers,
> Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
> (recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
>
|||OK. Perhaps you have changed the column order on the table at the
subscriber, or the subscriber and publisher schema are out of sync in some
way. If you run sp_scriptpublicationcustomprocs @.publication = 'yourpubname'
do you get the same stored proc syntax as the one currently existing on the
subscriber? Is this the same column order in the Insert Statement as that
existing on the subscriber?
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
A few weeks ago, I drop the replication and add a new column in both
publisher and subscriber server and made a new replication. Recently, I
found that a new column did not replicate a data. I check with
sp_browsereplcmds found that it update a another field. Why? How to fix it?
please help
RC
Firstly, it's worth mentioning that sp_repladdcolumn will do what you
require 'in-place' ie there's no need to set up the publication from
scratch. You may have had other reasons for doing this anyway. So, to find
out a little more, are the schemas on the publisher and subscriber now
identical? If not, do you have any filters in place? Did you create the
replication stored procedures yourself?
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
|||the schema is the same on publisher and subscriber and no columns filtering
RC
"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@.Pygmalion.Com> glsD:%23M9TOCQFGHA.1312@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx .gbl...
> Firstly, it's worth mentioning that sp_repladdcolumn will do what you
> require 'in-place' ie there's no need to set up the publication from
> scratch. You may have had other reasons for doing this anyway. So, to find
> out a little more, are the schemas on the publisher and subscriber now
> identical? If not, do you have any filters in place? Did you create the
> replication stored procedures yourself?
> Cheers,
> Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
> (recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
>
|||OK. Perhaps you have changed the column order on the table at the
subscriber, or the subscriber and publisher schema are out of sync in some
way. If you run sp_scriptpublicationcustomprocs @.publication = 'yourpubname'
do you get the same stored proc syntax as the one currently existing on the
subscriber? Is this the same column order in the Insert Statement as that
existing on the subscriber?
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)